Alexander Otaola vs the Mayor vs the Department of Elections in Miami-Dade

Alexander Otaola vs the Mayor vs the Department of Elections in Miami-Dade. Alexander Otaola Updates on the Legal Process Against the Mayor and the Department of Elections in Miami-Dade

On February 5, 2025, during his program “Hola Ota-Ola,” Alexander Otaola Casal, former candidate for the mayoralty of Miami-Dade County, informed his audience about the current status of the lawsuit he filed with the Miami-Dade County justice system. The lawsuit is directed against the current mayor, who was also his opponent in the last elections for her second term, and against the Miami-Dade Department of Elections.

Alexander Otaola Denounces Delays in His Electoral Lawsuit Against the Mayor of Miami-Dade and the Department of Elections

Miami, FL – February 5, 2025, Alexander Otaola reported this Wednesday during his program Hola Ota-Ola that the legal process he filed against the current mayor of the county, Daniella Levine Cava—who is serving her second term—and against the Miami-Dade Department of Elections remains “in process, but very delayed.” The lawsuit, filed after last year’s elections, alleges irregularities in the electoral process and seeks to challenge the results that gave victory to his opponent.

Otaola highlighted that the legal process is ongoing but has experienced significant delays that have complicated the progress of his case. According to Otaola, his legal team, led by the VPP Law Firm, has submitted additional documentation to the courts to demand that the case proceed and be expedited. The former political aspirant criticized the slowness of the judicial system and suggested that the delays might be an attempt to wear down his fight for what he calls “electoral transparency.”

Details of the Lawsuit:

The lawsuit, filed in June 2024, questions the handling of votes, the supervision of polling stations, and the final certification of the results. Candidate Alexander Otaola has filed a lawsuit in court against Daniella Levine Cava and the Department of Elections, challenging the results of the county elections. Otaola alleges that Levine Cava used her power in the county to carry out various actions that gave her electoral advantages.

According to Otaola, Levine Cava intentionally manipulated crime statistics at the end of her first term to protect her image during the elections. Furthermore, Otaola claims that an exit poll showed him as the favorite, and that it is impossible he only reached 12% of the vote intention. These accusations, along with several other allegations, are under investigation. The case highlights the importance of transparency in the management of public safety data.

Lawyers demand speed:

The attorneys from VPP Law Firm argue that the delay in the process violates the principles of timely justice and undermines public confidence in the system. Multiple motions and additional evidence have been submitted to demonstrate the urgency of this case.

Otaola’s statements:

In his program, the former candidate reiterated his commitment to “take the legal battle to the last consequences.” “We will not allow time to erase the irregularities. Citizens deserve to know the truth about how these elections were conducted,” he said.

Pending reactions:

So far, neither the mayor’s office nor the Miami-Dade Elections Department have issued official statements regarding Otaola’s accusations or efforts to expedite the trial.

Political context:

A polarizing figure in local politics, Otaola ran for public office for the first time in 2024, capitalizing on his popularity as a communicator. His campaign focused on issues such as security, fiscal management and the fight against corruption. Although he lost by a narrow margin, his base of supporters continues to demand a thorough review of the electoral process.

How is it possible that, despite Florida being considered part of the Republican “red tide,” Miami-Dade’s Democratic Mayor Daniella Levine Cava was re-elected when it is alleged that her management has been deficient in key areas such as the infrastructure of Miami International Airport, the Port of Miami, the affordable housing crisis, the increase in crime and other problems that have deteriorated the quality of life, leading many residents to migrate to other counties or out of state?

Outcome of the Litigation:

The outcome of this litigation could set a significant precedent in future elections, especially in a county where elections are often decided by narrow margins. In the meantime, Otaola promises to keep his audience informed through Hola Ota-Ola, a platform he uses to combine entertainment and political activism.

Otaola’s audience, known for its active participation in political and social issues in South Florida, remains attentive to the development of this case, which could have important implications for local governance.

For now, the court is expected to evaluate the new evidence presented and determine the next steps in this process, which has captured the attention of public opinion in Miami-Dade.

Analysis of the Electoral Process:

The elections in Miami-Dade took place in a climate of high expectation and local tension. Although the county did not experience significant technical problems in vote tabulation, unlike 66 other counties in Florida that faced failures in their counting systems, the transparency and reliability of the electoral process were widely questioned.

Low voter turnout and the perception of data manipulation by the local administration fueled suspicion and distrust among voters. Additionally, the re-election of Mayor Daniella Levine Cava with a wide majority in the first round generated disbelief among sectors that expected different results, considering the supposed Republican advantage in the state.

Stay Updated:

The outcome of this litigation could set a significant precedent in future elections, especially in a county where elections are often decided by narrow margins. In the meantime, Otaola promises to keep his audience informed through Hola Ota-Ola, a platform he uses to combine entertainment and political activism.

Otaola’s audience, known for its active participation in political and social issues in South Florida, remains attentive to the development of this case, which could have important implications for local governance.

For now, the court is expected to evaluate the new evidence presented and determine the next steps in this process, which has captured the attention of public opinion in Miami-Dade.

Political Support for Otaola:

During his campaign, Otaola received support from various influential community figures, including local businesspeople and leaders of community organizations who shared his vision of transparency and the fight against corruption. Additionally, his base of supporters was primarily composed of citizens who knew him through his program and trusted his commitment to democratic values and accountability.

The outcome of this litigation could set a significant precedent in future elections, especially in a county where elections are often decided by narrow margins. In the meantime, Otaola promises to keep his audience informed through Hola Ota-Ola, a platform he uses to combine entertainment and political activism.

Otaola’s audience, known for its active participation in political and social issues in South Florida, remains attentive to the development of this case, which could have important implications for local governance.

For now, the court is expected to evaluate the new evidence presented and determine the next steps in this process, which has captured the attention of public opinion in Miami-Dade.