Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... |
Tabla de Contenido/ Table of Contents
- 1 Ana de Armas and the Intense Controversy in Miami-Dade: #NoMoreAnaDeArmas
- 2 A History of Romance: From Hollywood to Controversy
- 3 The Rise of #NoMásAnaDeArmas
- 4 Taty Guiribitey Sends Protest Letter to Louis Vuitton
- 5 The DDA’s Role and Promotional Billboards
- 6 Luxury Brands Targeted by the Campaign
- 7 The Controversy’s Broader Context
- 8 A Call to Action
- 9 Conclusion
Ana de Armas and the Intense Controversy in Miami-Dade: #NoMoreAnaDeArmas
Cuban actress Ana de Armas, celebrated for her international film career, finds herself at the center of a heated controversy in Miami-Dade due to her romantic involvement with Manuel Anido Cuesta, stepson and advisor to Cuban dictator Miguel Díaz-Canel. In a county home to a deeply rooted Cuban exile community, many of whom have endured decades of repression under the Castro regime, this relationship has sparked a campaign demanding her removal from public spaces and major brand advertisements.






A History of Romance: From Hollywood to Controversy
Before her current relationship with Manuel Anido Cuesta, Ana de Armas was involved in several high-profile romances that kept her in the international spotlight:
- Marc Clotet: Her brief marriage to the Spanish actor from 2011 to 2013 marked her early rise in the public eye.
- Ben Affleck: Ana’s relationship with the American actor in 2020 garnered significant attention during the filming of Deep Water. The couple’s breakup in 2021 was widely covered by the media.
- Paul Boukadakis: Rumored to have dated the Tinder executive, though this was never confirmed publicly.
- Manuel Anido Cuesta: Her current partner, linked to Cuba’s repressive regime, has incited widespread backlash, particularly among Cuban exiles who see this relationship as deeply insensitive to their suffering.


The Rise of #NoMásAnaDeArmas
Prominent figures like business mogul Taty Guiribitey and influencer Alexander Otaola have spearheaded the #NoMoreAnaDeArmas movement. This campaign calls for the actress’s image to be removed from all public representations in Miami-Dade, labeling her association with Anido Cuesta as a direct affront to a community scarred by decades of abuse from the Cuban regime.
Taty Guiribitey Sends Protest Letter to Louis Vuitton
Taty Guiribitey has taken the protest global, formally urging luxury brands like Louis Vuitton to end their association with Ana de Armas. “We demand respect for Cuban exiles. Ana de Armas cannot represent the brands we consume while being connected to those who have inflicted so much pain,” she declared.
The DDA’s Role and Promotional Billboards
Controversy escalated when it was revealed that Miami’s Downtown Development Authority (DDA), led by Manuel Reyes, had permitted promotional billboards featuring Ana de Armas to appear in prominent locations throughout Miami. Cuban exile leaders view this as a disrespectful gesture, particularly in a county symbolizing freedom for those who fled the Castro dictatorship.
“Miami cannot become a showcase for individuals linked, directly or indirectly, to the dictatorship,” said Alexander Otaola on his program.
Luxury Brands Targeted by the Campaign
The Cuban exile community has called on brands like Louis Vuitton to sever ties with the actress. Taty Guiribitey personally requested Ana’s removal from their catalogs, amplifying the #NoMoreAnaDeArmas movement’s global reach.



The Controversy’s Broader Context
Miami-Dade, home to the largest Cuban exile population, is a sanctuary for those who escaped the Castro regime’s oppression. Ana de Armas’s relationship with Anido Cuesta is perceived as dismissive of this history. Coupled with her public image appearing on promotional materials, many argue it undermines the county’s values and the sacrifices of its residents.
A Call to Action
The Cuban exile community is urging local authorities to immediately remove Ana de Armas’s image from public spaces in Miami-Dade. Additionally, they are advocating for a boycott of products and brands associated with her. The campaign has gained momentum as more voices join the cause.
Conclusion
Ana de Armas, once admired for her career achievements, now faces a powerful wave of rejection in Miami-Dade. The Cuban exile community, with its history of resilience and sacrifice, demands respect and consistency from those who share its spaces.
As local authorities consider how to address the controversy, the message from the Cuban exile community is unmistakable: “No more Ana de Armas in Miami-Dade.”