Daniella Levine Cava: A Polished Image vs. a Fractured Reality in Miami-Dade?

Daniella Levine Cava: A Polished Image vs. a Fractured Reality in Miami-Dade?

Miami-Dade, a county that oscillates between the luxury of South Beach and the daily struggles of its residents, has in Daniella Levine Cava a leader who masters the art of modern communication. Now in her second term, the mayor has built an image as a “polyglot grandmother, professional, and political influencer,” capable of connecting in English, Spanish, and Creole. But behind the filters of her social media and her colorful speeches, uncomfortable questions arise: Is her administration as efficient as her narrative? Or do the deterioration of key infrastructure and the shadows of electoral irregularities reveal a leadership more focused on optics than substance?

The “Influencer” Mayor: Social Media, Languages, and Social Causes

Daniella Levine Cava is not a traditional politician. With over 71K followers on X, 48K on Instagram, and 20K on Facebook, her strategy resembles that of a content creator: she wears green to plant trees, pink to support the LGBT+ community, and poses with families at farmers’ markets. Her trilingual ability—a rarity in Florida politics—allows her to address the 67% of Spanish speakers and the Haitian community with equal ease.

Her media achievements:

• First woman elected as county mayor (2020).
• Promotion of social programs: increased funding for affordable housing and educational scholarships.
• International visibility: participated in COP28 and signed climate agreements with European cities.

But behind this narrative, critics point to a paradox: “While she dresses as an activist, her administration navigates turbulent waters.”

Elections Under Scrutiny: Lawsuits and Allegations of Irregularities

In 2023, former candidate Alexander Otaola filed a lawsuit against the county’s Department of Elections, alleging “systematic failures in vote counting” during the elections that re-elected Levine Cava. Although the case remains in court, a shadow of doubt lingers:

Key Allegations:

• Use of voting machines with alleged software errors.
• Delays in delivering results in predominantly Latino districts.
• Lack of transparency in the post-election audit.
• Changing the order of the full name to secure a more favorable position on the ballot.

The mayor has denied any irregularities, attributing the criticisms to “political interests that reject progress.” However, for skeptical sectors, the lawsuit exposes a gap between her rhetoric of inclusion and the practices of the system that keeps her in power.

Was Manny Cid a “Strategic Candidate” to Benefit Levine Cava?

Cid’s candidacy was seen as a Republican challenge to Levine Cava. However, Otaola, citing the fact that Levine Cava offered Cid a position in her administration after her victory, suggests that his candidacy may have actually been part of a coordinated strategy with the mayor. If true, this would imply an unusual transpartisan agreement aimed at:

• Dividing the Republican vote: If Cid managed to attract conservative voters loyal to Otaola, he contributed to splitting and weakening the Republican Party in the race.

Manny Cid’s “Position” in Levine Cava’s Administration

If Levine Cava brought Cid into her administration after the elections, this could be interpreted in two ways:

• A Unity Strategy: In politics, it is common for winners to integrate moderate rivals to expand coalitions, though this is not a frequent practice. If Cid accepted the position, it could indicate pragmatism.
• A Political Favor: If the position is perceived as a “reward” for his participation in the race, it would fuel theories of covert coordination.

This scenario presents a bold realpolitik hypothesis, but without documented evidence (emails, testimonies, agreements), it remains speculative. However, it serves as a reminder that in Miami-Dade—where ethnic (e.g., Cuban-American), ideological, and partisan loyalties often intertwine—unexpected alliances are never out of the question.

Infrastructure in Crisis: Airport and Port, Symbols of Neglect

If there is one issue that encapsulates the frustration toward the administration, it is the state of Miami International Airport (MIA) and the Port of Miami. Both, key economic pillars of the county, are in “code red,” according to a report by the local Chamber of Commerce.

Miami International Airport (MIA):

Recurring Issues:

• Air conditioning failures during peak summer heat.
• Dirty restrooms and leaking ceilings in the North Terminal.
• 12-year delay in runway renovations.

Critical Infrastructure Failures:

• Out-of-service emergency generator: The original backup generator stopped working years ago and has yet to be replaced. The airport currently relies on a rented generator, leading to high operational costs and significant risks.
• Deterioration of electrical equipment: The power distribution system has been subjected to makeshift and hazardous repairs, with exposed components and no available replacements due to their age.
• Battery system failure: Auxiliary batteries have completely failed, showing signs of overheating and irreversible damage.

Maintenance, a fundamental pillar in managing any critical infrastructure, appears to have been completely neglected at MIA, compromising both its operability and safety.

Port of Miami: Failed Investments

• Outdated cranes limiting competitiveness against Jacksonville and Savannah.

Key Update (February 4, 2025): Audit Exposes Systemic Failures in Miami International Airport Management

The 2025-039 Report by the Florida State Auditor General, presented on February 4, 2025, has revealed serious deficiencies in the administration of Miami International Airport (MIA), confirming long-standing concerns raised by employees and experts about opacity and ethical risks. The report, which analyzed airport procurement and governance between 2022 and 2024, identified three critical failures that jeopardize the integrity of public funds.

1. Lack of Transparency in Public Information (Finding 1)

Detected Issues:

• Delayed meeting minutes: 3 out of 44 Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meeting records were published with delays of up to 28 days.
• 2023-24 Budget: Released 15 days late, violating legal deadlines.
• Hidden contracts: 22 contracts worth $560.9 million were not published on the BCC portal, despite exceeding the $325,000 disclosure threshold. These contracts were only revealed after the audit, with delays ranging from 30 to 1,002 days.

Impact:

• Violation of Florida’s Public Records Law (FS 119.07).
• Increased risk of embezzlement and public distrust.

Recommendation:

• Assign dedicated personnel to ensure real-time publication of public records.
• Implement quarterly audits to oversee compliance.

2. Insufficient Ethics Training for Executives (Finding 2)

Detected Issues:

• Non-compliance with required training: Florida law mandates 4 hours of annual ethics training for BCC members, but Miami-Dade only provided 2 hours every two years.
• Untrained officials: 6 out of 14 BCC members failed to complete the mandatory training between 2022-2024.

Impact:

• Higher risk of conflicts of interest due to lack of regulatory awareness.
• Potential exposure to state penalties.

Recommendation:

• Align ethics training with state requirements.
• Monitor compliance through an automated tracking system.

3. Unreported Conflicts of Interest in Procurement (Finding 3)

Detected Issues:

• Non-compliant officials: 7 employees responsible for contracts exceeding $35,000 failed to submit financial interest disclosures in 2022.
• Lack of oversight: MIA did not notify state authorities of these violations, nor did it implement internal controls to prevent them.

Impact:

• Heightened corruption risk in multimillion-dollar contracts (e.g., favoritism toward companies linked to officials).
• Potential fines of up to $10,000 per employee under Florida’s Ethics in Government Act.

Recommendation:

• Appoint a Chief Ethics Compliance Officer to review financial disclosures and audit suspicious contracts.

Audit Conclusion

The report confirms that MIA operates with outdated procedures and weak oversight, fostering a culture of impunity previously denounced by former employees, including Juan Ortega. While Mayor Daniella Levine Cava promised reforms in 2021, the audit demonstrates that these changes were largely superficial.

Final Recommendations:

• Restructure MIA’s Procurement Department.
• Create a real-time public platform to publish all contracts and meeting minutes.

Source: Florida State Auditor General, Report 2025-039 (flauditor.gov).

Political Reactions & Next Steps

This audit further deepens the credibility crisis in Miami-Dade County, where both MIA and PortMiami—economic cornerstones of the region—continue to operate under questionable standards.

The Board of Commissioners: Negligence or Complicity?

The deterioration of MIA and the Port of Miami didn’t happen overnight. The Board of Commissioners—led by figures such as Raquel Regalado (Education), Jean Monestime (Budget), and Kevin Marino Cabrera (District 6)—has been criticized for prioritizing mega tourism projects over urgent local needs.

Controversial Decisions:

• Approval of $400 million for Miami Freedom Park (a soccer and commercial complex), while public schools received only $50 million for repairs.
• Silence on the lack of affordable housing, despite 20% of the population living below the poverty line.

The failures and crises at Miami International Airport (MIA) and PortMiami, two critical infrastructures facing operational, structural, and management challenges, raise a fundamental question: Where have the mayor and commissioners been? In their regular meetings, how have they failed to notice these ongoing problems?

Recurring Factors in the Crisis

• Insufficient Investment: Both projects have prioritized expansion over maintenance (e.g., MIA spends on new terminals but neglects drainage repairs).
• Extreme Climate: Miami is highly vulnerable to flooding, and both infrastructures operate with outdated systems.
• Corruption: Recurrent cases of embezzlement in contracts (e.g., bribery scandals at PortMiami in 2018).
• Fragmented Management: Multiple agencies oversee MIA and PortMiami, making accountability difficult.

Leader or Persona? The Criticism of Prioritizing Image

Levine Cava has turned her image into a political asset, but for many, this highlights a disconnect from real issues:

Symbolic Gestures Without Substance

• In 2022, she posed with a shovel at a reforestation event, while the county cut the maintenance budget for parks.
• She promoted a small business aid program during the pandemic, yet 40% of the funds were never distributed, according to internal audits.

“We don’t need a mayor who adapts her image to the occasion. We need someone who will confront the commissioners, take responsibility for the lack of oversight in her administration, and fight corruption. She failed in her first term, and in the second, the outlook is uncertain.” – NewsMiamiDade

Conclusion: Miami-Dade at a Crossroads

The county faces a post-election challenge beyond the ballots: Will it continue rewarding leaders who prioritize public perception over real governance? Daniella Levine Cava embodies this dilemma—a modern media figure, yet questioned for opacity in structural crises.

As one phrase summarizes it:

“Dubai was built in the desert; Miami stands on the frontlines of climate change and inequality. Without transparency, this ‘tropical dream’ will be nothing more than a mirage for the majority.” – NewsMiamiDade

#MiamiDadeIsNotAHashtag
What future do we want? Demand accountability.